Volume Factor Dividend Tree – Q4 2026 Strategy Outlook and Trade Rationale

The Orchard is Evolving; The Roots Are Not

Executive Summary

The fourth quarter begins with both the market and the Dividend Tree portfolio at important inflection points. During Q3, the Dividend Tree orchard leaned heavily toward energy, commodities, and the physical economy. Three of the five largest holdings, Occidental Petroleum, APA Corp., and Permian Resources, came from the energy ecosystem. Kulicke & Soffa provided exposure to semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure, while NewMarket represented an economically essential specialty materials business. The common thread was not simply energy or cyclicality. These companies combined dividend discipline, free cash flow, capital efficiency, and favorable Volume Factor characteristics.

Q4’s Dividend Tree portfolio looks substantially different. The five largest holdings are Lamb Weston, Automatic Data Processing, Verisk Analytics, Delek US Holdings, and Moelis & Company. Together they represent just 14.5% of the portfolio.  The top five illustrate how dramatically the orchard has been replanted in Q4. Q3’s largest positions emphasized energy production, commodities, and manufacturing infrastructure. Q4’s leaders span consumer staples, payroll and human capital services, data and analytics, refining, and investment banking.

More importantly, the portfolio has rotated. Using broad thematic groupings rather than formal sector classifications, approximately 45% of the Q4 portfolio is now connected to the financial ecosystem, including insurance, asset management, capital markets, financial information, and consumer finance. Another roughly 18% is invested across productivity, information, consulting, technology, engineering, and workforce services.

Q4’s Dividend Tree is no longer principally an energy orchard. It has become an orchard increasingly populated by businesses whose fruit is supported by recurring revenues, fee income, insurance premiums, intellectual capital, information, financial assets, and durable free cash flow. Different branches, same roots are Q4’s Dividend Tree takeaway.

From Q3 to Q4, A Meaningful Rotation

The transformation from Q3 to Q4 demonstrates why Dividend Tree is designed as an adaptive strategy rather than a static dividend portfolio. The Volume Factor Dividend Tree strategy does not begin the quarter deciding that energy should be reduced or financials should be increased. Nor does it attempt to forecast which sector will outperform. Instead, the orchard is reconstructed from the universe of dividend growers possessing strong free cash flow, then ranked according to Volume Factor sponsorship.

Q4 Portfolio Theme	Approximate Weight	Representative Holdings
Insurance and financial protection	24.3%	AFL, AIZ, CNO, EG, GL, MET, PFG, PRI, PRU, TRV
Asset management, capital markets and financial information	16.5%	APAM, MC, OWL, TPG, TROW, FDS, MORN
Consumer finance	4.6%	BFH, OMF
Productivity, information and technology	18.3%	ACN, ADP, PAYC, RHI, QCOM, TTEK, VRSK
Consumer and media	15.1%	CHD, KTB, LW, M, SIRI, SJM
Housing, transportation and logistics	8.8%	IBP, MATX, MTH, WERN
Health care	7.5%	ELV, RPRX, UNH
Energy	2.9%	DK
Cash	2.0%	Cash

These thematic groupings reveal more about the Q4 outlook than simply comparing sector labels. The Dividend Tree is moving from assets whose cash flows were heavily influenced by commodity prices toward businesses whose cash flows are increasingly generated through reoccurring revenue streams.

Financials Are the Centerpiece of the Orchard

The largest Q4 theme is unmistakably financial. Insurance and financial protection companies alone account for approximately 24% of the portfolio. Aflac, Assurant, CNO Financial, Everest Group, Globe Life, MetLife, Principal Financial, Primerica, Prudential Financial, and Travelers collectively form one of the largest groves in the current orchard.

Another substantial branch consists of capital markets and asset management companies including Artisan Partners, Moelis, Blue Owl, TPG, and T. Rowe Price. FactSet and Morningstar extend that theme into financial information and analytics, while Bread Financial and OneMain Financial provide exposure to consumer finance. This concentration does not mean Dividend Tree has made a top-down forecast that financials must lead. Rather, it tells us where a disproportionate number of healthy fruit bearing companies are currently passing the strategy’s fundamental and Volume Factor screens.

An important distinction is that these businesses possess different revenue sources, but many share attributes that fit the Dividend Tree process particularly well. They all generate substantial cash, maintain shareholder distribution policies, frequently operate asset light business models, and possess opportunities to grow dividends as their businesses and capital bases expand. In Dividend Tree terminology, the fruit is tangible, the branches are growing, the roots capable of nourishing future growth, and Volume Factor is indicating that institutional capital has been increasingly tending to these stocks.

A Different Kind of Technology Exposure

Another revealing characteristic of Q4 is considering what the Dividend Tree does not own. The Volume Factor Dividend Tree strategy is not attempting to compete with the S&P 500 by loading the orchard with the same mega capitalization technology companies dominating the benchmark. Rather, the technology and productivity exposure is expressed through businesses such as Automatic Data Processing, Verisk Analytics, Accenture, Paycom Software, Qualcomm, Robert Half, and Tetra Tech. These companies participate in digitization, workforce productivity, data, analytics, consulting, engineering, semiconductors, and business efficiency. They provide exposure to technological change without requiring the strategy to depend exclusively upon the most expensive or most popular AI narratives.

This distinction is increasingly relevant because the current market has again become concentrated. During September, the Invesco QQQ Trust advanced 4.54%, while the iShares Russell 2000 ETF declined -4.36%, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF fell -4.40%, and the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF declined -6.55%. The generals advanced while much of the broader army retreated.

Dividend Tree therefore enters Q4 with meaningful exposure to productivity and innovation, but through a considerably different collection of stock trees than those dominating the capitalization weighted indexes. However, this is not an anti-technology position. It is a quality and valuation conscious way of participating in technological productivity while retaining the strategy’s dividend and free cash flow roots.

The Fruit Remains Visible

While the Q4 model has rotated significantly, several consumer franchises continue to provide visible fruit. Lamb Weston is the portfolio’s largest holding at 3%. J.M. Smucker represents another substantial position at 2.7%, while Church & Dwight, Kontoor Brands, and Macy’s provide additional consumer exposure. These companies illustrate another dimension of the Q4 strategy.

Not every part of the orchard needs an exciting secular narrative. Some of the most productive fruit trees can be businesses selling ordinary products to repeat customers while consistently generating cash. Dividend Tree is ultimately a growth of income strategy. The purpose of the growing branches is to potentially produce more fruit over time, while strong free cash flow roots provide the nourishment necessary to sustain those distributions. The concept explicitly identifies dividends as the fruit, dividend growth as the growing branches, and free cash flow as the vital root system supporting both. Q4 therefore combines financial and information businesses with companies where demand may be less dependent upon a single economic narrative. The diversification of cash flow sources is central.

Healthcare Adds Another Root System

Healthcare represents approximately 7.5% of the current model through Elevance Health, UnitedHealth Group, and Royalty Pharma. These positions bring yet another type of economic root system into the orchard. Elevance and UnitedHealth participate in health benefits and managed care, while Royalty Pharma derives cash flows through pharmaceutical royalties.

Their inclusion reinforces an important theme within Q4. The portfolio is not simply moving from one concentrated sector bet to another. Instead, it is assembling multiple sources of cash generation – insurance premiums, management fees, investment banking revenues, financial information subscriptions, payroll processing consumer brands, healthcare cash flows, transportation and logistics. The Dividend Tree is seeking an orchard in which the fruit may come from many different branches, even though every tree must satisfy the same underlying standards.

Cyclicality Has Been Pruned, Not Removed

Perhaps the clearest contrast with Q3 is energy. Three of Q3’s five largest holdings came from the energy ecosystem. Energy exposure was justified not merely by commodity prices but by free cash flow, capital discipline, shareholder distributions, and favorable Volume Factor sponsorship. Today, Delek US Holdings is the primary remaining energy position at 2.88%. That is a major adjustment.

Yet Dividend Tree has not eliminated economically sensitive cyclical businesses. It has simply changed where it is finding them. Installed Building Products and Meritage Homes provide exposure to housing. Matson and Werner Enterprises provide exposure to transportation and logistics. Tetra Tech participates in engineering and infrastructure. Robert Half provides exposure to employment and professional services. Moelis participates directly in corporate transaction activity.

Thus, the cyclical branches remain, but the orchard has become less dependent upon one commodity complex. This is what disciplined pruning looks like. The objective is not to preserve yesterday’s winners because they worked last quarter. The objective is to keep the root system healthy.

What the Current Portfolio May Be Telling Us

Taken collectively, the Q4 holdings appear to be expressing several messages. The first is capital discipline over capital intensity. Compared with Q3’s heavier energy and physical economy orientation, Q4 has significantly greater representation among businesses capable of generating revenues from intellectual property, information, premiums, assets under management, professional services, and recurring customer relationships.

The second is selectivity over broad style exposure. The market itself currently reflects enormous dispersion. Recent Volume Analysis shows Capital Weighted Volume and Capital Weighted Dollar Volume continuing to establish new all-time highs even as breadth deteriorates. Price paused, but capital pressed forward.

The third is diversification of economic drivers. Q3’s orchard contained a significant cluster whose fortunes were influenced by energy and commodity prices. Q4 distributes those economic exposures across insurance, capital markets, asset management, information services, consumer companies, health care, technology, housing, transportation, and selective energy.

Our last theme is less dependence on the headline index narrative. The S&P 500 increasingly reflects the performance of its largest companies. Dividend Tree looks considerably different. From this vantage point, the portfolio remains consistent.

These themes may create periods when the strategy may behave very differently from the capitalization weighted benchmark. But that difference is a designed feature of the process, not a defect. The objective is not to recreate the S&P 500 with dividend paying securities. It is to construct an orchard from the top dividend growers with the strongest roots (free cashflow) and the most favorable capital sponsorship (the volume factor).

Q4 Market Outlook, Strong Supply Lines, Weakening Breadth

The broader market backdrop remains short-term constructive yet longer-term concerning. The strongest bullish evidence continues to come from Capital Weighted Volume and Capital Weighted Dollar Volume. Both have been setting new all-time highs. Even though price has stalled near resistance, the supply lines have continued moving forward. At the same time, breadth is becoming increasingly problematic.

The generals have returned to leadership while the troops, lieutenants, and dividend brass commanders have retreated. The NYSE Advance Decline Line has broken beneath important levels. The market’s evolution from And Then There Were None toward And Then There Were Some is being challenged. This is particularly relevant for Dividend Tree because traditional dividend equities have recently been among the areas under pressure.

One contributing factor may be interest rates. The September 28 Volume Analysis report highlighted the 10-year Treasury yield moving above 5%, noting that rising rates can pressure small caps, equal-weight equities, and dividend stocks. That headwind should not be dismissed.

But it also creates potential optionality. The 10-year Treasury yield has reached a historically unusual large premium relative to the dividend yield of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. It may be argued that slowing growth and moderating inflation may cause a further sustained rise in yields less likely.  If yields eventually stabilize or retreat, one of the most significant headwinds confronting dividend stocks could diminish.

The Outlook for the Q4 Orchard

For Q4, the strategy enters the season with a considerably different orchard than the one that began Q3. The portfolio is less energy dependent. It is more heavily populated by insurers and financial franchises. It has substantial exposure to capital markets, asset managers, analytics, workforce productivity, consulting, and information services. This is largely a reoccurring revenue theme. It also maintains meaningful consumer and health care exposure. It retains selected cyclical positions. And it continues to maintain diversified position sizing, with the largest holding representing only 3% of the portfolio.

This is what should be expected from an adaptive process during a transition tape. The Volume Factor Dividend Tree strategy is not declaring that financials are the next technology stocks. It is not declaring the energy cycle finished. It is not forecasting lower rates. And it is not betting that the market’s generals must fail. It is simply following where the combination of fruit, growing branches, strong roots, and capital sponsorship opportunity presently resides.

Crop Insurance Remains Essential

The current market environment makes the final component of Dividend Tree especially important. The orchard can contain healthy individual trees while the weather surrounding the orchard deteriorates. Strong companies do not eliminate systemic market risk. That is why the Volume Factor Risk Overlay remains the strategy’s crop insurance. Capital Weighted Volume and Capital Weighted Dollar Volume currently argue against abandoning the field. Their new highs remain meaningful bullish evidence.

Yet market breadth argues against complacency. A mature bull market ultimately requires more than a few dominant trees. If the generals break higher and the broader ranks regain their footing, the market could develop a healthier formation. If the generals continue rising while small caps, equal weight equities, dividend stocks, and market breadth continue deteriorating, the divergence may become increasingly concerning. This has been a market where the supply lines remained strong even as the ranks retreat. Dividend Tree does not need to forecast which scenario wins out. It needs to tend the orchard while remaining prepared for whichever scenario wins out.

Closing Perspective

The transition from Q3 to Q4 provides an excellent illustration of what Dividend Tree is designed to accomplish. In Q3, the process found many of its healthiest trees in energy, commodities, and the physical economy. In Q4, the same process is finding many of its healthiest trees among insurance companies, asset managers, financial services, analytics, productivity businesses, health care companies, and selected consumer franchises.

The positions changed as capital flows were redirected. The strategy did not change. Dividends remain the fruit. Dividend growth remains the growing branches. Free cash flow remains the strong root system supporting the tree. The Volume Factor identifies which fundamentally healthy trees appear ripe for the picking. And behind the scenes, the Volume Factor Risk Overlay remains the crop insurance protecting the orchard when an ordinary change of season threatens to become something more severe.

The current portfolio therefore represents more than a collection of new holdings. It represents the Volume Factor Dividend Tree strategy’s outlook expressed through institutional capital deployment. Q3 cultivated the opportunities of that season. Q4 has replanted the orchard for the opportunities apparent now. One thing is nearly certain; the fabric of the orchard will continue to evolve quarter to quarter. The disciplined process of tending the tree does not.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

Kingsview Wealth Management (“KWM”) is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed.

Kingsview Investment Management (“KIM”) is the internal portfolio management group of KWM. KIM asset management services are offered to KWM clients through KWM IARs. KIM asset management services are also offered to non KWM clients and unaffiliated advisors through model leases, solicitor agreements and model trading agreements. KWM clients utilizing asset management services provided by KIM will incur charges in addition to the KWM advisory fee.

This material has been prepared by Kingsview Wealth Management, LLC. It is not, and should not, be regarded as investment advice or as a recommendation regarding any particular security or course of action. Opinions expressed herein are current opinions as of the date appearing in this material only. All investments entail risks. There is no guarantee that investment strategies will achieve the desired results under all market conditions and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term.

This information does not address individual situations and should not be construed or viewed as any type of individual or group recommendation. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser, tax professional, and/or legal counsel before implementing any securities, investments, or investment strategies discussed.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There are risks associated with any investment strategy, including the possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will achieve its objectives.